Payday Loans
Before you accept the loan payday loans 100 or even up to
   

Login Form

Please register and log in to comment on articles. We won't spam you or sell your email address. Mainly because we're too lazy.



Maybe Not Acceptable PDF Print E-mail
Written by Sparrow Thirteen   
Wednesday, 13 April 2011 20:04

Smith_and_refHe is a man lauded by the vast majority of the Scottish media. A man from Lanark, the same small town that produced Rab Douglas and Stephen McManus, amongst others. A man who once ruled with an iron fist as the Dundee United assistant manager, and a man who would be knighted tomorrow if sycophantic, nauseating basket cases like Jim Traynor have their wildest wet dreams become reality. A man who is one of the public faces for a self-styled dignified institution. A man who has assembled a squad on a shoestring budget of £25 million. Oh, how they long for the days when they blew £60 million in a season in the forlorn hope of lying about a Champions League semi final. A man, in his dying, rotting days as Rangers manager, issues a pathetic excuse of an apology.

The words of a pathetic, bigoted, disgusting excuse for a man.


 

It would have been easier to talk about the title run in, the forthcoming matches and the need to utilise every member of the squad to combat fatigue and expectation, but once again the shame rise up and show themselves up for the archaic nonentities they truly are. Walter Smith has urged the fans of the club he manages to drop chants which were ‘maybe not acceptable’ in the modern era. He goes onto state: 

"It's fine when you have a great club, with a great tradition, as Rangers have and people feel that's a part of it.

"But I think when there is a reaction, as there has been over the last few years, against those traditions then the people who do sing them - and I would stress that I don't think it's the majority of Rangers supporters - need to take into account that in a modern era it's maybe not acceptable for them to do so.

"Therefore they need to realise the club are going to suffer quite drastic consequences if they don't stop.

"So I would ask them, considering the problems that our club have, to take that into account and stop singing the songs that are offensive."

Excuse me?! I wiped my glasses, to make sure they were not broken and I was actually processing the words in front of me. I read once more, I stared until the words were blurred into one heap of sectarian justification. Maybe not acceptable in the modern era, Sir Dignity himself offered. The modern era! Is Smith truly justifying that there was a time when reveling in being up to knees in fenian blood was somehow acceptable? Rather than apologising, he seems to almost leave a trail of regret that his loyal supporters have to adopt a politically correct world where glorifying the deaths of innocent Catholics is seen as a taboo by the European governing body. Of course, UEFA are probably just picking on ‘the peepul’ because the SFA have found no evidence of sectarian filth spewing from the mouths of the sons of William. It’s just an Old Firm issue, the Scottish media will again argue, more in hope than fact.

Rangers like to bang the broken drum about tradition, and yet here Smith talks about the sectarian bile as if somehow the songs of hate are an underpinning element of their very existence. Rather than being linked by inclusion and acceptance, the manager is openly admitting what was known amongst Celtic supporters for generations, that they are a hate filled club whose only identity is fuelled from the hatred of others.

Analysing his words further, e seems to be implying that they should stop singing the songs that we have all heard on more occasions than we can truly recall, because if they don’t the club will suffer in some way. Rather than leaving a strong message that these songs are not acceptable because they are sectarian, hate filled evil and completely out of touch with a supposed civilised society, he offers a meek explanation that his beloved club may be punished. If there was no threat of sanction, the words would be spewed as loud as ever, without any thought of the levels of acceptability. The financial turmoil that they find themselves in means that any penny taken away is another step towards vanishing into history’s damning footnotes. If they were as rich as Manchester City, I am sure they would even have a sectarian fund to cover all fines and games played behind closed doors as a result of their century old problem of hatred.

Yet despite all this, Celtic are treated as an equal protagonist in this ill that sweeps through society with a battered brush. We are not the same, we will never be the same, and in a country where newspapers are petrified of standing up to the establishment club, it is only a sickening reinforcement that the songs of shame are endorsed from above. The government sits on the fence and argues that we are both two sides of a tainted coin, and yet their silence speaks louder than the strongest condemnation as to which side they wish to appease. UEFA are the ones oddly being criticised for speaking the truth when the problem has always lay on Glasgow’s doorstep. A club that seems to interpret tradition as an unmovable object, something that cannot be changed under any circumstance, even if the circumstance is actually doing the long ignored right thing. But no, Martin Bain plays the innocent victim card and offers to ‘vigorously defend’ his club against sectarian chanting. Occasionally, and especially whilst dealing with clear simpletons like Bain, things need to be in black and white.

Is the ‘Billy Boys’ sectarian? Yes

Does it contain the line ‘we’re up to our knees in fenian blood’? Yes

Can this be justified in any way? No

Conclusion: Come out and tell your fans who harbour erotic thoughts for 1690 to stop singing their songs because this squalid hatred has no place twelve years into the 21st Century. You are embarrassing yourselves with your pathetic reasons, you are shaming Scotland once again, and your laughable excuse for an argument that Celtic sing some ‘folk songs’ just makes you look like the out of date club you truly are. The attitude of Rangers FC is not acceptable. No maybes about it.

 

Follow the author of this piece on twitter

Last Updated on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 20:05
 

Comments  

 
+7 #1 danny bhoy 2011-04-14 18:33
Good article but Celtic fans be carefull,i know the songs about the IRA ect are not illegal but do we really need to sing them @ a football match we are just giving these ejits a reason to try & hammer us.
 
 
+1 #2 sparrow.thirteen 2011-04-15 08:11
I would argue that the IRA songs are not sectarian, apart from a tiny and stupid minority who have in the past added 'soon there will be no protestants at all' into On the One Road. However, with the bright glare of the media spotlight on Uefa's damning comdemnation of Rangers we cannot allow ourselves to be labelled as merely two sides of the same bigoted coin. The Celtic support seems to be changing, and songs that are pro-Celtic rather than pro-Irish Republicanism seems to be the norm. There is no need, even for the songs that focused on the rebellious IRA from the Easter Rising or the ones fighting for a united Ireland from 1969 onwards. IRA now equates to the dissidents that harbour very little public support. We simply cannot allow ourselves to be viewed in the same way as them, because our songs are diverse of supportive, not divisive and full of hate.
 

You need to register to post comments.

RocketTheme Joomla Templates