|
Written by The Big Cheese
|
|
Monday, 07 November 2011 22:55 |
|
The relief was clear to see on Lennon’s face at Fir Park when Hooper bundled in the winner on Sunday. The end of a very important week in which Celtic managed to keep a tentative grip on their season. Two wins were asked for and the bhoys duly delivered (despite going behind in each game). Celtic’s leaky defence is for another article as this one is devoted to the role of a certain number twenty at Celtic Park.
Since his arrival a couple of years ago Paddy McCourt has been used sparingly by Celtic managers, albeit because of injury. The Derry Pele as he is known has given us some of the most incredible individual goals Celtic park has ever seen despite mainly being used as a sub. Paddy is probably the closest thing to a throwback to the 60’s and 70’s with his exhilarating ability to skip past people at ease.
Paddy’s gift is a skill that has virtually gone from football since young players are having this aspect coached out of them from an early age. Players are told to look up and pass which is all very well but there is no better sight for fans than a player terrorising defences by running at them. Great players like Best, Johnstone and Giggs have achieved iconic status for doing what Paddy does when given the chance – beat the man!
Many Celtic fans think Paddy should be a bit part player called upon when things aren’t going right. This week’s events probably support that argument when he contributed more at Fir Park in fifteen minutes than he did when starting against Rennes. However I’m a big McCourt fan and I don’t think he has been given a proper chance to show what he can do on a regular basis. I mean has Paddy started five to ten games in a row for Celtic? I firmly believe that if we stuck by him and played him consistently on the wing then most defences we come up against will shudder at the prospect at dealing with both him and Forrest as Celtic’s wide men. Teams genuinely fear when people run at them as it’s simply not seen anymore. Most clubs in the SPL don’t have one player who can freely beat their marker, Celtic have two and need to start utilising both of them.
Personally I’m not a fan of playing McCourt in the hole behind one striker. I think he is at his best if he stays wide and cuts in. It surely can’t be worse than playing Commons who wouldn’t have created a goal if he had played 900 minutes at Fir Park on Sunday. My point is Neil could benefit by giving Paddy game time because there is something seriously wrong with Commons and we can’t afford any passengers on the park at the minute. With McCourt and Forrest running at people it will also take pressure off our shaky back four which has looked slightly more convincing this week. Another point regarding the midfield is that Lennon needs to decide who his favoured two are in the middle of the park. Simply playing four centre mids across the park because they are talented doesn’t work. Just ask Mr Lampard, Mr Gerrard and various England managers who have tried to fit them in simply because they are quality players.
For the fans who doubt Paddy’s ability to last ninety minutes I propose this, give him a run of five games or so then judge his claim to a first team jersey. If he doesn’t produce or he continues to get injured then go back to using him as a bit part player. However if he does produce what we know he is capable of then Celtic can move Ledley into the middle of the park and leave out underperformers such as Commons and Kayal. Celtic are lucky to have one of the most naturally gifted players in the country. I propose we simply let him play. |
Comments
And with Big Vic and Joe covering behind hopefully things are looking up but let's just take one game at time for now
The 90 minute myth about Paddy, is just that. He played 90 minutes at Ibrox in January and had a great game playing behind Samaras. I can't think of a game where he would have greater responsibility and he came through it superbly.
Among the incredible solo goals he's scored in his career, he scored one of the best goals I've ever seen against ICT at Celtic Park, a goal that unfortunately didn't get the recognition it deserved as we threw away a two goal lead that day.
When Paddy comes off the bench, the first thing he does is either: attempt a killer pass, execute a killer pass, create a goal scoring chance for himself or score a goal. Keep an eye on it. His effectiveness and goals/assists to games ratio is also very impressive, outstripping that of the pathetic return of McGeady.
I think he has earned his chance at a run in the team. Also, I think we could be in danger of over-exposing Forrest at his young age. He looks like he needs a rest at this stage. It remains to be seen if Paddy is purely an impact player.
The Motherwell game showcased his talents. An impact player, coming on when the opposition are tiring, in order to use his skill. The fundamantal difference against Motherwell was that he passed the ball. Usually, he would have ignored Stokes' run on the left and ran into trouble. It was pleasing that he made the right decision and that the team scored.
There is no denying that he is a wonderful player. A real throwback to an era where players were more free-spirited and had larger personalities. But, as The Thinker highlights, he is overrated. If he is happy playing a bit-part role, he should be kept at the club but he does not have the energy levels or complete tactical awareness to be any more than this.
I genuinely enjoy watching him but there are glaring failings in his game, namely the ability to track back and tackle and the fact he has the knack of making himself invisible for long spells when we really need 11 players playing.
For me he's a luxury, a strategic weapon to be introduced as a potential game changer. I just don't think we're comfortable enough playing him from the start.
RSS feed for comments to this post.