Payday Loans
We are here to help Payday loans Why would you
   

Login Form

Please register and log in to comment on articles. We won't spam you or sell your email address. Mainly because we're too lazy.



The Dog Barks and the Caravan Moves On... PDF Print E-mail
Written by Lachiemor   
Wednesday, 23 February 2011 18:58
More years ago than I care to remember, I joined an internet community forum for the first time – that forum was the E-tims.  After some months I was asked by Glen Timtim, the moderator, if I would like to contribute some articles to the main site.  I did so gladly and for a couple of years the E-tims published my ramblings about times gone by and players that many of our present fans had only heard of.
In time there was a division amongst those who ran the site and Glen, Hullbhoy and perhaps others ceased to be part of it.  Since these were my main links to the E-tims I was a bit disconcerted, but sent my copy in faithfully  most weeks, until I was asked by Glen in his new guise as Eddie Pearson to contribute to a venture called Celtic Underground. For a wee while I wrote for both before settling for a regular space in this place you now visit.
As someone who has contributed to Celtic Underground since its fledgling state I feel entitled to offer some comment on recent events – most notably the report on Sunday's match taken from the Huddleboard.
I have form with regards to my views on the Huddleboard – suffice to say that I am not their favourite columnist – but each to his own - I have long since decided that they are better ignored and the feeling is probably mutual.
To say that I was dismayed by Eddie's decision to publish that pile of drivel which masquerades as wit is an understatement.  I was actually disgusted that such muck would ever find a place on what I had always regarded as the crème de la crème of Celtic web-sites.  I know it came with a public health warning, but did not excuse its very presence on our site.
When Celtic F.C. embraced the Green Brigade and facilitated their group presence at Paradise, it did not take a genius to foresee that problems lay in store.  As the bard says, if you sup with the devil you need a lang spoon, and the modus operandi of the Green Brigade was too at odds with the aims and objectives of Celtic PLC for a harmonious relationship to emerge.  Listening to Sunday's match and the singing of songs from outwith the approved canon – including I may say sectarian chants directed at Wattie – simply illustrates the tensions that remain between the two bodies.
There is a terrific series of children's novels by a woman called Susan Cooper called 'The Dark is Rising'.  These books are superior to those about the speccy boy wizard although the film versions of young Potter's adventures are far superior to the ham-fisted attempt by Hollywood to capture the essence of Cooper's works about Will Stanton and the Arthurian legends.
In one of the books there is an episode in which the Dark Lord visits Will's  house on Christmas Eve.  As they are time Lords of a sort, the younger man takes them outside time and expresses his rage that the evil one should enter his family home, only to be reminded that he was invited in by Will's father who has unwittingly made his acquaintance in the real world and that even Will, as the last of the 'Old One's', cannot affect the ancient magic once the invitation was made.
My point is that Eddie, who I consider the best web-master around, and someone who has directed the tone and manners of this site with the lightest of touches, has I believe, in publishing this garbage – for garbage it is - offered the same invitation to Timworld's yahoos and numpties as Will Stanton's father did to the Dark.
The door has been opened and we must ask how easy it will be to police standards, in terms of both articles and comments, when it has been accepted that filth is O.K. when it purports to be humour.
If it were not for the fact that it is pro-Celtic, it would be easy to see this piece of tripe on Follow Follow.  The standard seems just about their level.
I texted my thoughts on this to Eddie and he did not agree saying that he thought our site was the better for it.  I find that viewpoint astonishing.  He – and others – have spent years building a web-site which stood for something in the pantheon of Celtic cyberspace, something which might best be described as 'class'.  That this piece even saw the light of our day, in my opinion undermines years of work.
I cannot recall whether it was in response to Michael Kelly's book or following one of Brain Dempsey's mutterings in the red-tops, but Fergus uttered the lines which head this article, in a sense putting them in their place.
Eddie assures me that nothing will change and that vigilance will remain an issue for us in terms of editorial control and the maintenance of standards.  I must trust him on this but I hope that when the dog barks and the caravan moves on those of us who saw this site as special still feel we have a place.

More years ago than I care to remember, I joined an internet community forum for the first time – that forum was the E-tims.  After some months I was asked by Glen Timtim, the moderator, if I would like to contribute some articles to the main site.  I did so gladly and for a couple of years the E-tims published my ramblings about times gone by and players that many of our present fans had only heard of.

In time there was a division amongst those who ran the site and Glen, Hullbhoy and perhaps others ceased to be part of it.  Since these were my main links to the E-tims I was a bit disconcerted, but sent my copy in faithfully  most weeks, until I was asked by Glen in his new guise as Eddie Pearson to contribute to a venture called Celtic Underground. For a wee while I wrote for both before settling for a regular space in this place you now visit.

 

As someone who has contributed to Celtic Underground since its fledgling state I feel entitled to offer some comment on recent events – most notably the report on Sunday's match taken from the Huddleboard.

 

I have form with regards to my views on the Huddleboard – suffice to say that I am not their favourite columnist – but each to his own - I have long since decided that they are better ignored and the feeling is probably mutual.

To say that I was dismayed by Eddie's decision to publish that pile of drivel which masquerades as wit is an understatement.  I was actually disgusted that such muck would ever find a place on what I had always regarded as the crème de la crème of Celtic web-sites.  I know it came with a public health warning, but did not excuse its very presence on our site. 

When Celtic F.C. embraced the Green Brigade and facilitated their group presence at Paradise, it did not take a genius to foresee that problems lay in store.  As the bard says, if you sup with the devil you need a lang spoon, and the modus operandi of the Green Brigade was too at odds with the aims and objectives of Celtic PLC for a harmonious relationship to emerge.  Listening to Sunday's match and the singing of songs from outwith the approved canon – including I may say sectarian chants directed at Wattie – simply illustrates the tensions that remain between the two bodies.

There is a terrific series of children's novels by a woman called Susan Cooper called 'The Dark is Rising'.  These books are superior to those about the speccy boy wizard although the film versions of young Potter's adventures are far superior to the ham-fisted attempt by Hollywood to capture the essence of Cooper's works about Will Stanton and the Arthurian legends.

In one of the books there is an episode in which the Dark Lord visits Will's  house on Christmas Eve.  As they are time Lords of a sort, the younger man takes them outside time and expresses his rage that the evil one should enter his family home, only to be reminded that he was invited in by Will's father who has unwittingly made his acquaintance in the real world and that even Will, as the last of the 'Old One's', cannot affect the ancient magic once the invitation was made.

My point is that Eddie, who I consider the best web-master around, and someone who has directed the tone and manners of this site with the lightest of touches, has I believe, in publishing this garbage – for garbage it is - offered the same invitation to Timworld's yahoos and numpties as Will Stanton's father did to the Dark.

The door has been opened and we must ask how easy it will be to police standards, in terms of both articles and comments, when it has been accepted that filth is O.K. when it purports to be humour.
If it were not for the fact that it is pro-Celtic, it would be easy to see this piece of tripe on Follow Follow.  The standard seems just about their level. 

I texted my thoughts on this to Eddie and he did not agree saying that he thought our site was the better for it.  I find that viewpoint astonishing.  He – and others – have spent years building a web-site which stood for something in the pantheon of Celtic cyberspace, something which might best be described as 'class'.  That this piece even saw the light of our day, in my opinion undermines years of work.

I cannot recall whether it was in response to Michael Kelly's book or following one of Brain Dempsey's mutterings in the red-tops, but Fergus uttered the lines which head this article, in a sense putting them in their place.

Eddie assures me that nothing will change and that vigilance will remain an issue for us in terms of editorial control and the maintenance of standards.  I must trust him on this but I hope that when the dog barks and the caravan moves on those of us who saw this site as special still feel we have a place.

 

Comments  

 
+2 #1 Psychoheart 2011-02-23 19:15
While I certainly had a good chuckle at the "match report" in question when I first read it, I have to say that I know where you're coming from. It seems almost out of place with what you come to expect on Celtic Underground. Had it not been mentioned on the article itself I could probably have guessed where it had originated.

As you - and no doubt others - know, I was very much an E-Tims/Kerrydale Street member rather than the Huddleboard in my message board days. That's just personal preference. These boards exist because we each have these preferences. Just because we all support Celtic doesn't mean we all think the same way.

I won't say I'm disappointed that the article appeared on here - as I said, I enjoyed it - but I am surprised. Everything has it's place.
 
 
+13 #2 Michael McKeown 2011-02-23 19:33
For a starter. This is my favourite Celtic Webpage. No doubts. It stands alone as the best and it is noted for its great articles. St Anthony, Lachie in the main are superb. I would never have the balls to post anything on here as I aint that good at conveying my opinions. My opinions are reserved for KDS where they go down like a lead balloon.
I received the match report via e-mail. Thought it was ok, nothing great. However I was very, very very surprised to see it on here. I would have never expected it to be on CelticUnderground.

What I like about here is the originality of the work that is published. I dont like the fact that posts are re-posted here. If they have to be, then they have to be "CU Class" and that was not.

After all I dont hold this place in such high regard for nothing.

My tuppence.
 
 
+6 #3 Eeramacaroonbar 2011-02-23 19:50
Lachiemor I often agree with your sentiments on here and usually when I see you are the author of an article I am about to read, I can usually guarantee it will be a well thought out and enlightening piece..........however after reading that, I think you need to calm, right, right down. You sound like someone who has an axe to grind with various Tic forums and tinternet sites. Fair enough a lot of them are hard work and a bit of a rabble. I agree that Celticunderground is one of the better sites for the more "discerning Tim" if you like, but that should not mean the site starts to get all "up it's own arse". I did not think anyone was like that on here until you wrote this article.

I for one took that article by Jimbhoy in the spirit it was meant and found it hilarious and witty in equal measure.Sorry to say it Lachiemor but you come across as being more upset with the politics of why it was shown on here rather than the content of it.

Everybody was in high spirits when that was posted and the timing and sentiment of it were spot on. I did not see the "muck" or "filth" you mentioned........I just read a very funny report on the game - no more ....no less. I think you should really see it the same way and not turn it into something it clearly isn't.
 
 
+7 #4 JackFury 2011-02-23 20:00
I did not like the match report, mainly because I just don't like lazy/ned/'witty' typing like that and the butchering of the English language that comes with it. It is a personal preference because I do not enjoy reading some lines twice to understand what was being said

I doubt it will become a trend and Lachiemor is just being overly cautious but I do generally avoid sites with that kind of writing.
 
 
+12 #5 brendan2k 2011-02-23 20:35
The article was posted far and wide and I was surprised. I didn't like it but worse than that I thought that parts of it held views that I did not care to be linked with. The health warning is no excuse nor is the fact that it may be considered funny. As has been discussed many times being funny does not exempt you from standards.
 
 
+6 #6 CanadaBhoy 2011-02-23 21:06
I'm with lachiemor on this. I didn't like the tone, the volume of swearing, the lousy grammar, the lack of class.
 
 
+2 #7 drgreen67 2011-02-23 21:19
Lachiemor, I have read your stuff since the old 'Maley' board on etims and really enjoy reading your thoughts on all things celtic, but i am afraid i have to disagree with you on this. Having just read the article i couldnt help laughing out loud (LOL i believe is the modern expression) and i certainly wouldnt expect to see that level of humour (or any) on follow follow!
 
 
+7 #8 greenjedi 2011-02-23 21:31
I'm also a etims/kerrydale st forum guy, as well as CQN as I can't get KDs at work. I've agreed with Psycho on most things from pretty much the start of etims and again I find myself in agreement, that I did laugh at the report, but was shocked that it did get published on here as it was very crude in it language and style of writing.
 
 
-4 #9 drgreen67 2011-02-23 21:37
ok so celtic underground is an elite site that must not be tarnished! Please listen to yourselves. (oh and plaese check my splling and grammer)
 
 
-8 #10 danny bhoy 2011-02-23 21:40
Lachie you remind me of xmas aye greetin
 
 
-1 #11 JackFury 2011-02-23 21:41
drgreen, how about you take a step back and listen to yourself

"and i certainly wouldnt expect to see that level of humour (or any) on follow follow!"

I know plenty of Rangers fans who did not find that match report funny, and I am sure find plenty of Rangers material funny that you do not. Do not presume to think you have say of what is funny and what is not
 
 
+5 #12 greenjedi 2011-02-23 22:07
drgreen67

I think its more to do with the fact that kids and their parents know that they can read this site and others such as KDS and CQN and not be exposed to bad language.
 
 
+8 #13 Bertie Peacock 2011-02-23 22:19
The most vulgar thing I have ever read online was a piece on vanguard bears that described in GRAPHIC detail Graham Spiers and Phil MacGiollaBhain in a homosexual, ahem, 'exchange'. It was a truly horrible, disgusting piece of work.

Jhimbo's piece was nowhere near that level of vileness. HOWEVER, for a site as erudite as this, I thought it was out of place, crude and did not fit in - certainly not with the happy, genial tone of preceding articles.

I would like to think it is a blip and hopefully Lachie and Eddie (and the rest of us!) can raise the tone in the very near future.
 
 
+4 #14 Tim_Bhoy 2011-02-23 23:37
Lachiemor, I agree.

The article in question lacked class - disappointing.
 
 
+3 #15 Theyhaveneverwonit 2011-02-23 23:49
I was extremely surprised to read it on here and somewhat disappointed. I pointed my 13 y.o son to this site a few months after I started frequenting it along with CQN because it was devoid of the language and half wits I would want him to avoid. Its also an excellent read for him from a historical p.o.v with the Boy in the Picture series as an example.

So I'm afraid to read this drivel and ok parts of it are funny and I might even have found the all of it funny when I was an impressionable 16yo (43 now) but I'm afraid if someone pointed me to that on a Rangers Website and it was written about us with the equivalent persons replaced I would be seething if I ever heard reputable Journo's or Fans referring to that website on phone-ins etc.

Some stats;

The F word or F'ing word is used 29 times
The C word is used 13 times
The B word is used 6 times

I did not count them, Google Chrome does it for me.

Far be it from me to tell any of the hard working authors of this site what to put on it and there is no "but" coming. Given that the page in question is almost at the top of the "hit" parade for the last 16 articles and its only been on there for a two days (I would guess it will be top by tomorrow morning)suggests it has attracted a significantly higher amount of traffic than normal on this site and that is down to the nature of the article being communitated. Take for example the amount of Facebook "hits" at 93, out of the last 10 articles the highest out with that was the Mark Crosas article with 27 hits to Facebook.

Enough said. There are plenty of sites where dross of this level can be read so I feel fairly safe I am unlikely to read an article penned by any of the current contributors of similar quality so that in itself will keep me coming back and listening to the podcasts. So keep the good work up guys, like Bertie says. O hope its a blip.
 
 
+2 #16 cameron 2011-02-23 23:58
The biggest problem with that "match report" was that it was trying to be clever and funny, and it failed on both counts.

I thought it was a terrible piece of writing. It pandered to the lowest common denominator in every line. And we complain about The Sun or The Record?

'Like a Fenian on a flume...' - well, how very clever. Does Hooper know what a Fenian is? Come to that, does the writer?

That report was the kind of knuckle-dragging, backward-looking, nasty, illiterate garbage you would expect on Follow Follow.

The fact of it being slathered in a jelly of self-indulgent, self-conscious, fifth-rate stream-of-consciousness pretentiousness made it all the more gut-churning.

Offensive garbage. On a fantastic day, it succeeded in making me ashamed.
 
 
+4 #17 locheilbhoy64 2011-02-24 00:44
I never actually read the aforementioned report. but it seems as usual there is a lot of backbiting against fellow supporters on a few of these sites which,I don't agree with.. Alot of sour grapes.. I personally don't agree with profanity being used on any public page but this happens. the way it sounds by other supporters comments, there is no concensus on this. I just wonder when at celtic park or ibrox do we as fans never swear. Or use words like bounder or cad..no I don't think so.. It is actually good to see, posters and administrators with the same passion as everybody else, although, some could be less agressive. for all the faint hearted out there; don't be frightened of a few swear words offensive as they are. Some comments about the green brigade (i'm not their biggest fan but for months it was them and them only that kept celtic park buzzing.. That's just a fact...
 
 
+6 #18 Green Homer J 2011-02-24 02:50
I am relatively new to the site (1st post) but I agree that the article was poor. I am a KDS member too & part of the attraction of these decent sites to me are the lack of bad language. Not a prude by any measure, but I have seen the bile on Rangers Media (among others) & they go beyond the pale. It is the only article I have not fully read, since joining the site.
 
 
-3 #19 Georgiebhoy 2011-02-24 05:09
The cynical :- "Surely the article wasn't included to generate hits on the site?"

The practical :- "Perhaps Eddie found it genuinely funny"

The obvious :- "If you don't like it, don't read it."

19 comments on the merits or otherwise of the original article is pushing this toward the "Most commented" top ten, but does it really deserve to be there? This is a "right to reply" piece on an article that almost everyone has said they are surprised/disappointed about it's inclusion.

Lachie:- you can and have produced better.
Everyone else - move on, nothing to see.

Hail Hail

G.
 
 
+2 #20 Justwokeup 2011-02-24 06:16
I enjoyed the article and laughed out loud a few times. I read most of the content on here however I didn't stop to think about whether I was surprised too see it on here. I saw it, read it, liked it and it would therefore not make me any less likely to return.

I genuinely am sorry you feel that way Lachie and I hope it doesn't discourage you from producing more content in the future.

With regards to kids reading it (which is reprehensible), credit to KDS and CQN for having the swear filters but they will hear alot worse at the match.
 
 
+1 #21 Eeramacaroonbar 2011-02-24 07:39
"I enjoyed the article and laughed out loud a few times. I read most of the content on here however I didn't stop to think about whether I was surprised too see it on here. I saw it, read it, liked it and it would therefore not make me any less likely to return.

I genuinely am sorry you feel that way Lachie and I hope it doesn't discourage you from producing more content in the future.

With regards to kids reading it (which is reprehensible), credit to KDS and CQN for having the swear filters but they will hear alot worse at the match."


Absolutely SPOT-ON Justwokeup. Thank Christ there are folk who see it exactly how it is. All the Mary Whitehouse wannabies on here were turning it into " Points of View" there ......unbelievable. I am glad Eddie is in control of what goes on here.

I find elitism and snobbery just as ugly as the feral, underclass muck that they are portraying (wrongly) this article by Jhimbo to be.
 
 
-1 #22 Psychoheart 2011-02-24 07:48
Why does it need to be "elitism and snobbery"? Why can't it just be personal preference? Do you like every kind of music there is in the world? My music tastes are fairly eclectic but even then I still have specific preferences that I'd listen to whenever as opposed to something I need to be in the mood for.
 
 
+2 #23 Eeramacaroonbar 2011-02-24 08:04
Psychoheart

I am not for one minute belittling the efforts and hardwork that go into celticunderground. As I have said it is easily the best Tic site going. Fair enough the article is not the usual fair for on here, but the widespread condemnation it is recieving.....I find a little hard to take. It does come across as people on their "high-horse" and the article is being turned into some "venomous, vile " piece that I do not really think it is.

As I suggested previously - Eddie caught the mood and the sentiment of the fans spot-on and the timing of it was just right.


People just need to take it in the spirit it was meant. It was a one -off funny article, that encapsulated the feeling of our entire support at just the right moment.

People should not take the article, the site or themselves so seriously.
 
 
-4 #24 drgreen67 2011-02-24 10:54
Jackfurry "I know plenty of Rangers fans who did not find that match report funny"

oh dee-dums, poor rangers fans, my heart bleeds.

re-arrange these words: your get out of *rse head your
 
 
-1 #25 drgreen67 2011-02-24 11:01
I am glad the articles on this site arent as self-righteous as its readers. Yes me included
 
 
+1 #26 mr green 2011-02-24 12:52
Although the article in question stepped over the line once or twice, the majority of it was extremely funny.

I think the value of laughter should not be underestimated.

Is it not possible that the article could have been edited slightly so that the humour could be enjoyed by everyone with out the risk of offending some people. There were some expressions which I didn't like and felt were unneccessary - and which could easily have been removed.

However, comedy at its best has a rough edge to it FFS. Ask yourself this: would the big yin (ie. Billy Connolly) have had a chuckle to himself? I certainly believe so.
 
 
-3 #27 greenjedi 2011-02-24 19:40
Mr Green, I think most people its language was out of step with a website that is read by kids as it one that parents will allow them to read because of certain standards of not allowing bad language
 
 
+5 #28 watchman 2011-02-24 19:46
Well, you've certainly excited a lot of comment Lachie.

After I read your article, I had to read the match report of course. Whilst not for the pc minded, it was authentic and imaginitive and I really don't understand why anyone (unless of the darkside persuasion) could say it wasn't funny. Don't see why you're making such a fuss, to be honest.

I appreciate that the site owners and writers will want celtic underground to have a certain tone and dignity. Many of the articles on here are respectful (and some paranoid and reactionary) and well thought out, which is fair enough. However, this leads to a distinct lack of real humour which is very odd for a website dedicated to football and to Celtic. The occasional interjection of an article like the one under discussion does no harm, in my opinion, to the underlying values of the site. We don't want the Sun, but neither do we want the Guardian.
 
 
+6 #29 Sir Alfie Connand Doyle 2011-02-24 22:41
Wasn't going to comment on this but everyone else has by the lookof it !

Not my thing. Infantile to see the least and the rape comparison is in especially bad taste.

Eddie, can we stick with the quality stuff like Lachie, St Ant and Harry ?

Cheers mate.
 
 
+6 #30 Harry Brady 2011-02-24 23:34
Lachie,

I didn't read the piece initially- got a few lines in and thought - this rubbish isn't for me. Following your piece I have tried a few more times to wade through it.

Pieces written in this style may appeal to the schoolboys behind the bicycle sheds but it's not for me. Sticking "rude words" in an article does not, for me, make something funny. I found reading it to much like hard work to have any humour.

I'm not offended by such matters, if something like this isn't for me I just ignore it.

We aren't a commercial entity and therefore have no stakeholders to answer to consequently eddie has merit in his points that if people don't like they can look elsewhere and whilst I would tell adults to look away if you don't like I do have sympathy for parents who may not want teenage kids reading such drivel.

Personally I steer away from message boards as I feel the more "direct" interaction between fans seems to occur there with sites such as etims, cqn and here specialising in articles and features.

Maybe Eddie was still drunk on the euphoria of Sunday when he posted the article on here because for me the most damming comment on this piece is that it's just sh1t!
 
 
+7 #31 dundalkcelt 2011-02-25 11:04
I think its harsh to say the match report is sh#t. It may not be to everyones taste.

For anyone that has read any Irvine Welch, this stuff is pretty tame.

There was a warning at the top of the page. I think we should be careful not to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

This is a great site...

HAIL HAIL
 
 
+5 #32 Harry Brady 2011-02-25 15:34
dundalkcelt - You're right. I'm as bad as everyone else if I say it's sh!t. I should have said "In my opinion..." As for Irvine Welch - that stuff's not for me either
 
 
-2 #33 JackFury 2011-02-25 21:23
DrGreen

"oh dee-dums, poor rangers fans, my heart bleeds.

re-arrange these words: your get out of *rse head your"

once again you have missed the point haven't you

I accept that something I find funny other don't and something others find funny I will not. You don't. So MY head is up my '*rse'?

everyone else is wrong and stuck up because YOU find it funny. Maybe its "just a bit of banter", and excuse you will read on Follow Follow

I did not find it funny and I have a right to not find it funny, if you can't accept that maybe your sense of humour is not the standard by which the rest of us are judged then its too late for you

I was not offended by the piece except the rape part but that due to a friends previous experience and I accept a simple lack of tact than anything. I just did not find it funny and hard to read because I don't like that ned speak and a personal preference. You may also notice I did not comment in the article in question either
 
 
+3 #34 RoNaNCFC 2011-02-26 09:20
In the post match euphoria I quite enjoyed the report but looking back It seems very out of place on CelticUnderground. If It becomes a usual appearence here then I can see a problem but as far as I'm concerned I have no problem with it being a one off occurence.

Hail Hail
 
 
+1 #35 drgreen67 2011-02-26 20:35
JackFurby. Sorry for your pain. Keep up the dignity
 
 
-1 #36 JackFury 2011-02-26 20:47
keep up the ignorance and immaturity
 
 
+4 #37 Johnybhoy 2011-02-27 08:29
I must say I was surprised to see THAT report posted up on CU after reading it on both KDS and Etims.

However, Eddie is the big cheese and it's his prerogative to post up articles. I dare say some of the articles I've had posted up on CU aren't of the highest standard

I will agree that it was a very, very poorly written and occasionally vulger piece of writing. The regular standard of CU is much higher than that and it's the main reason I log onto CU daily.

To all the guys who regularly contribute, keep up the good work and keep the standard of the site up there with the very best on the 'net.

To the haters....shut it!

Cheers

J
 
 
-1 #38 CelticChuck 2011-03-08 09:48
One good thing Jhimbo's match report has done is hopefully discourage Lachiebore from treating us to any more of his drivel.

Less is more Lachie, less is more.
 
 
-1 #39 sellic 2011-03-09 01:42
Lachie, the huddleboard don't know who you are. If you're a 'columnist' I must be a flippin' media magnate, I'm off to shop for a private jet.
 
 
-1 #40 Lachiemor 2011-03-10 18:57
sellic

Curious - if you google 'Lachiemor' the number of references to how much the inhabitants of the Huddleboard disapprove of my ramblings is surprising for folk who don't know who I am.

 
 
0 #41 hiker14344 2011-03-10 20:29
Didn't appreciate the article, was surprised to see it on this of all sites and put it down to a one off disagreement with style.
 
 
0 #42 sellic 2011-03-10 21:18
Quoting Lachie Mor:
sellic

Curious - if you google 'Lachiemor' the number of references to how much the inhabitants of the Huddleboard disapprove of my ramblings is surprising for folk who don't know who I am.

:-)

From 5 and a half years ago?? All that proves is you hold a grudge and that your pomposity hasn't faded with time. We, on the other hand, are still the biggest & busiest Celtic forum on the web.

Funnily enough on the two occasions that I've had the misfortune to run across your 'column' (musn't laugh) I've always thought, there is a man who spends far too much time 'googling' himself, or words to similar effect.
 
 
+1 #43 Lachiemor 2011-03-10 22:15
It may be the biggest and busiest, that doesn't make it good by any stretch of the imagination if that report is anything to go by.

My thoughts on that article were nothing to do with a grudge or 'pomposity' but simply about good taste. It may have fitted the Huddleboard's style - it was out of place here.

As for my use of the word 'column', it was just a word, but having written almost 100 articles for Celtic Underground and the E-Tims I think I can be permitted the odd slip up here and there.
 
 
+1 #44 Jhimbo 2011-03-10 22:23
Google Hunskelping Lachie. I am immortal. :) Chill out the nets big enough for everyone regardless of taste.
 
 
-1 #45 Lachiemor 2011-03-11 05:41
Jhimbo

Fair enough!

 
 
+1 #46 chris1916 2011-05-19 17:39
its greed
 

You need to register to post comments.

RocketTheme Joomla Templates