Payday Loans
We are here to help Payday loans Why would you
   

Login Form

Please register and log in to comment on articles. We won't spam you or sell your email address. Mainly because we're too lazy.



Cool Heads Must Prevail PDF Print E-mail
Written by Eddie Pearson   
Wednesday, 17 February 2010 02:44

Mowbray_applaudsBefore we start let's be clear, I want to see Celtic win games the same as the rest of us. I want to see Celtic win leagues as much as the next guy but I'm not convinced that it's in the club's best interests to give into the knee jerk reactions that appear to be in vogue. Now is the time to keep a cool head. We are at a crossroads and the wrong choice could see us travel down a road which we will come to regret. 

10 points is a massive gap to make up and at this moment I really doubt whether it is possible but it's certainly not impossible and until that changes I'll keep hoping. And while I'm hoping I'll keep attending Celtic Park. Why? Because for the first time in a couple of years I'm actually excited about the prospect of going to see this team of ours. I first started to detect some strange emotion take hold of me a month or so ago and it was so long since I had experienced it I'd almost forgotten what it was. Eventually I realised that I was feeling a tiny wee bit of excitement and anticipation about going to see the Celtic. I was looking forward to walking into Celtic Park and seeing at least a few players with whom I could connect with once again.  I was anticipating the buzz of watching a team actually try to play attacking football. Despite the result at Pittodrie I’m looking forward to seeing my team play Dundee United on Saturday. Sure, things may not go to plan but right now it feels better than that sense of grinding obligation which dragged so many of us down last season.

And that's what Tony Mowbray has brought back to Celtic. Of course there are flaws in the team structure and we'll come onto those in a minute but right now, win lose or draw this feels like a Celtic team I can connect with once again because under Tony Mowbray they are trying to do something which had been forgotten about - they are trying to entertain the fans.

I follow Celtic for many, many reasons, most of them tribal but I have a fundamental understanding about what the club should be on the park. Billy McNeill described us as the Cavaliers - Playing football the Glasgow Celtic way. I follow Celtic in the hope that we will see spectacular goals and great skill on the ball. I don't follow Celtic to see us passing the ball across the back of the defence protecting a one goal lead with ten minutes to play. I'm in it for the entertainment and the enjoyment of being part of the moment. It's about getting up off your seat because you can't help yourself but be swept along with the buzz of it all.

And I believe that's what Tony Mowbray wants to provide for me as a fan.

And furthermore I believe that, if given time, Tony Mowbray can do this and can bring the league title back to Celtic Park.

A quick look at the forums from last season would have shown Celtic fans complaining about the defence, the midfield and the attack. Mowbray has removed almost every player from the club that the fans wanted gone. In their place he has brought in either players who have shown themselves to be quality, Fortune being an obvious example, or players who have the potential to show themselves to be quality, Jos for example. His attempts to purchase players such as Ramis show that he understands the need for a strong back line and only the greed of an agent who didn't work in the interests of his client prevented the Spaniard from joining up.

Despite a disappointing January he has inspired McGeady, the best player in Scotland, to express himself fully. He has, without any doubt, bought better than his predecessor and is starting to reshape Celtic into a side which we can once again enjoy watching.

Of course we need the team to find a greater level of consistency but in Mowbray's defence he has been dealt a cruel hand with regard to injuries to new signings and key personnel at crucial times in the season. Does anyone seriously believe that Caddis, Thompson or O'Dea would have been first choice picks on Saturday had we not lost players to injury? The manager is clearly trying to build a strong back line - if things had gone to plan our back four against Aberdeen would have consisted of a German internationalist, the Swedish player of the year, an U23 Spanish internationlist and a player on loan from Bayern Munich.

He has also had the misfortune to be manager of the club during a season when every honest mistake which could possibly be committed by a referee has occurred. We have been denied stonewall penalties, had goals disallowed for no reason, watched players avoid bookings for actions which Celtic men have been sent off for and then had to accept it when told "honest mistake guv'nor."

Do we need to improve? Most certainly. Can we improve under Tony Mowbray? I believe so. We are six months into an operation to restore Celtic football club from the mess which it was left in last summer. A job of that size cannot be fixed overnight. Those who are calling for the manager’s head have chosen to ignore the size of the task Mowbray was left with. Calls to replace him with managers such as John Hughes, Neil Warnock and Sven Goran Ericsson are the rantings of madmen who have their own personal axe to grind. To create such an upheaval within the club while our rivals are producing their most consistent spell of football in the past ten years (only 1 domestic defeat all season) is lunacy.

Tony Mowbray needs to be supported by the fans as he tried to make changes. Constant “punt him” articles and threads form part of a vicious circle which undermines the club and from which Celtic cannot escape. We all want Celtic to be something that we are proud of. The signs are there that Tony Mowbray knows what Celtic fans want from their club and is working to achieve that. Let’s give the man the time a job of this size requires.

Last Updated on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 03:02
 

Comments  

 
-1 #1 Daleybhoy 2010-02-17 11:28
I agree with most of what you say here. TM is here for the duration, he has brought in to many players for us to be able to change now or in the summer. No one can deny that it's exciting watching celtic just now, maybe too exciting at the back. My major concern is the some of the subs he makes, sammy on for keane when you are 4-2 up and brown on at left back being the obvious ones but we've got to hope that with a full squad to choose from he isnt forced to improvise as much with positions as he is just now.
 
 
-1 #2 Georgiebhoy 2010-02-17 13:30
Daleybhoy,

Improvise? I'm not sure he is improvising with those decisions...I think he's tinkering....and Eddie - O'Dea came back into the team as CAPTAIN FFS!

I don't think he knows his best team - even after what? 8 or 9 months in charge?

Still scunnered and in need of a drink.

Hail Hail

G.
 
 
-2 #3 the daddy 2010-02-17 15:17
Thanks for a bit of balance Eddie, a decent article and a sensible argument delivered, which made for a pleasant and encouraging read - particularly after the ramblings of PAC in the previous piece.

Have to agree with you, as I too am enjoying going to watch Celtic playing of late and certainly far more than I have done for a few seasons. Of course the results are not as we would wish but the football is exciting and I, like you, am looking forward to the game on Saturday with Dundee Utd, when I think we will win by 3-1 or perhaps 3-2.

It may well be that we have to wait until next season to see the benefits of the recent upheaval and, see the consistency we are looking for but I do believe that it will be a much rosier picture for us Celtic supporters this time next year.

If you can’t wait that long, there a plenty of other things you can do on a Saturday afternoon and you can start by getting off the manager’s back.
 
 
+1 #4 St Anthony 2010-02-17 16:07
Eddie makes an eloquent case for the defence. However the fact remains that there is not one sign of progress with this side. Look at Raith beating Aberdeen last night after they put four past us. I saw that result on teletext and my heart sank.

To be fair to Mowbray he has brought good footballers to the club. And that's part of the problem. We have too many soft centres and are an easy touch for anyone who gets in our face. The one thing you cannot coach is 'heart'. You've either got it or you haven't and we don't have one individual with a sniff of it. And we need a manager who can inspire the players AND the fans.

I'll say it again. If we remove him now we can give a new manager the last 15 games or so to work out a side for next season. Could a new guy really do any worse ?
 
 
-2 #5 eddiepearson 2010-02-17 16:22
Quoting Daleybhoy:
I agree with most of what you say here. TM is here for the duration, he has brought in to many players for us to be able to change now or in the summer. No one can deny that it's exciting watching celtic just now, maybe too exciting at the back. My major concern is the some of the subs he makes, sammy on for keane when you are 4-2 up and brown on at left back being the obvious ones but we've got to hope that with a full squad to choose from he isnt forced to improvise as much with positions as he is just now.



I can't argue with the decision to play Brown at left back being an odd one. However, some folk (not yourself Daleybhoy), have used this as part of their reasoning why the manager has to be sacked. That's crazy talk. Sacking a manager because he brings a right sided player on at left back?

As for Samaras, I didn't have a problem with it at the time - 2 goals to the good and an opportunity to give another forward a run out for the final 20 minutes. Made sense to me at the time. Unfortunately the left back gave away a penalty and it becomes another "tactical blunder" when in reality it wasn't a contentious issue at all.
 
 
-1 #6 eddiepearson 2010-02-17 16:24
Quoting Georgiebhoy:
Daleybhoy,

Improvise? I'm not sure he is improvising with those decisions...I think he's tinkering....and Eddie - O'Dea came back into the team as CAPTAIN FFS!

I don't think he knows his best team - even after what? 8 or 9 months in charge?

Still scunnered and in need of a drink.

Hail Hail

G.


Who else should have been captain for those games? The squad Mowbray has inherited was bereft of leadership. Keane? He would have been slaughtered for giving the captaincy over to a short term loan player who had only arrived the night before. Fortune? Perhaps but at that point there were still folk claiming that Fortune wasn't a player.

Who should have been given the captaincy for those games?
 
 
-2 #7 eddiepearson 2010-02-17 16:30
Quoting St Anthony:
Eddie makes an eloquent case for the defence. However the fact remains that there is not one sign of progress with this side. Look at Raith beating Aberdeen last night after they put four past us. I saw that result on teletext and my heart sank.

To be fair to Mowbray he has brought good footballers to the club. And that's part of the problem. We have too many soft centres and are an easy touch for anyone who gets in our face. The one thing you cannot coach is 'heart'. You've either got it or you haven't and we don't have one individual with a sniff of it. And we need a manager who can inspire the players AND the fans.

I'll say it again. If we remove him now we can give a new manager the last 15 games or so to work out a side for next season. Could a new guy really do any worse ?


Ach Saint, Aberdeen are no guide to quality. Did they not do something very similar last season when they beat us 4-2? Did they not get pumped by a first division side or something?

As you say he has brought in good players. He's brought in a ton of them and perhaps the board should have allowed him to bring them in during the summer and they would have bedded in by now. Surely he deserves the opportunity to try to work with the players he has brought to the club?

Unlike with the previous manager I see where he wants to take Celtic. There is a definitely plan in place. There's a footballing philosophy that I can support and get excited about again and that's why I support the guy. I believe that to change the entire approach to the game in the way he is trying takes time. We need to allow him the time to ensure that philosophy takes root.

As for replacements - I'm seeing names like Neil Warnock and Ericsson being mentioned by some on the forums. That's just crazy. Lambert isn't ready (let's not forget which league Norwich are playing in at the moment) and as for Mark Hughes, I wouldn't thank you for a Mark Hughes Blackburn type team between now and the end of the season.

Who would do a better job of exciting the fans and bringing attacking football to the club between now and the end of the season?
 
 
+2 #8 wayofthecass 2010-02-17 19:08
Quoting the daddy:
If you can’t wait that long, there a plenty of other things you can do on a Saturday afternoon and you can start by getting off the manager’s back.


Wow....the ignorance of that comment is astounding. So if you feel the need to express displeasure at how the club has been playing this season then just don't bother going?????
I thought it was people not showing up over the last 2 seasons that was the problem????
 
 
-1 #9 tommo 2010-02-17 19:42
agree with what you say i just wish tm would start complaining when bad decisions go against us instead of refusing to be critical of refs and there linesmen
 
 
+1 #10 eddiepearson 2010-02-17 20:01
Quoting tommo:
agree with what you say i just wish tm would start complaining when bad decisions go against us instead of refusing to be critical of refs and there linesmen

Agreed. His reaction to Lafferty's foul on Hinkel wasn't acceptable. Let's be clear - I don't think he is above being criticised, far from it. I just feel that I can see where he wants to go with this team and it's the same thing I want from a Celtic side. I'm prepared to give him the chance to show what he can do with his own players. I don't think that's unreasonable.
 
 
-1 #11 Georgiebhoy 2010-02-18 00:28
Eddie,

In no particular order, Hinkel, Boruc and McGeady were surely in front of O'Dea for the armband, by dint of being first choice players if nothing else?

Agree that it highlights lack of leadership.

You believe we can improve under Mowbray. Define Improve. Win two games in a row? Defend a two goal lead? (TWO GOALS!!!!) Field the same team for two games in a row? Are we looking at a case of "expectation management" that another popular forum has been accused of many times?
Unfortunately, I am coming to the conclusion that the job may be too big for Tony, which is a shame because he does have a genuine bond with the club and the fans.

If I am proven wrong, I will happily stand everyone a cyber pint....

Hail Hail

G.
 
 
-1 #12 strathavenhoops 2010-02-18 13:44
for the first time in ages i actually agree with the poster tony mowbray must be supported by not only the board but us the support 10 points is not ideal but with 2 victories over them it suddenly becomes more attractive now lets get behind the man .there was enough of you wanting change last season so back the man
 
 
-3 #13 Daleybhoy 2010-02-18 15:33
We all wanted deadwood out and players brought in. He done that and brought in 8 players in a month. It is going to take time, we need to keep the heid(not that heid though).
 
 
0 #14 JimmyMack 2010-02-18 18:35
Eddie, only a year and a bit back, punters were calling for Strachan to be replaced, this in an attempt to save the season.

History shows he was allowed to stay on, and his side eventually surrendered the title to the bankrupt mob across the city.

All that was needed, I was reminded continually, was a better man in charge of the squad, and all would be well in Paradise.

A year later, folks are once again hoping to see the incumbent moved on, and another man put in place. This, once again, to possibly redeem our season.

while a winning run from now, till May, would be a sight for sore eyes, it just isn't going to happen.

The new guy in charge has made a horses arse of things, and no amount of tales of missed opportunities, MITB bias, or fantasy back fours can change that.
 
 
0 #15 JimmyMack 2010-02-18 18:36
A team that was pipped to the post by our nearest rivals for honours, has now made way for TM's own team, which is now a staggering 10 points behind a truly rotten, penniless bunch of OAP's, youngsters, and duds.

How could it ever be allowed to come to this? Would Tony Mowbray ever have been considered for such a big job, had he not been a Celtic man?

My guess is that he wouldn't, and for the simple reason that he has done little of note in the game, other than taken his former side from the championship, into the EPL. That and his cup run.
 
 
0 #16 JimmyMack 2010-02-18 18:37
That in itself is of course something to be proud of, but his season in the EPL, culminating in a speedy return to the lower division, showed that he would not compromise his footballing philosophy, regardless of results.

That may be enough for some, but in the two horse race that is the SPL, Celtic have to win, end of. Failing to do so, and allowing the dobs to take another title, is a step too far.

Our board should be drawing up a short list as I type, and I hope this time, they do not go for any easy option.

No more Mr. Nice Guy, give us a proven winner.


BTW, just today had a mail from my older mate, and he is disgusted with what is taking place. Worst he has ever seen, and that includes the five sorrowful mysteries.
 
 
+1 #17 hotlicks 2010-02-18 20:29
Eddie, any chance you can get the 1000 symbols upped a bit.

cheers
 
 
+1 #18 eddiepearson 2010-02-19 18:45
Quoting hotlicks:
Eddie, any chance you can get the 1000 symbols upped a bit.

cheers


I'm not sure I know what you mean. In fact I'm positive I don't. What you talking about willis?
 
 
0 #19 eddiepearson 2010-02-19 18:52
Jimmy,

I've tried to avoid comparing back with the former manager because I know that my opinion on Strachan tends to cloud my judgement. However, under Strachan a couple of things were happening - firstly I didn't meet anyone who was enjoying going to the games. There was a sense of responsibility and obligation in attending games. There was certainly no enjoyment or anticipation. Under Mowbray I am looking forward once again to going to games. I'm anticipating being entertained and, while it's not an extensive survey, a number of folk in my place of work tell me they feel exactly the same. Secondly under Strachan there wasn't any sense of light at the end of the tunnel. There was no sign of improvement nor was there any suggestion from the manager that he had a vision of the club that I wanted to buy into. Mowbray is at the very least talking a good game and when I watch his team I can see what he is trying to achieve and that's what I want my Celtic to be.

Basically I have the same vision of the team as Mowbray and I want to give him a chance for that to come to fruition. I see signs in the team that he is moving in the right direction. Under Strachan I had a completely different vision of what a Celtic team should be and I saw no sign that he could or wished to change that vision to something more in line with my own.
 
 
0 #20 eddiepearson 2010-02-19 18:53
And by the way - does the comment software not let you put all that in the one post? If so I'll need to take a look at the settings because that's no use. Let me know if that is the case.
 
 
-1 #21 JimmyMack 2010-02-19 19:01
Quoting eddiepearson:
And by the way - does the comment software not let you put all that in the one post? If so I'll need to take a look at the settings because that's no use. Let me know if that is the case.


It certainly restricted me putting it all in in a oner, Eddie. Thought I was somehow transported to twitterland!.

Great to have the comment updates btw, I'd not have seen your responses till tomorrow at the earliest, otherwise..
 
 
+2 #22 JimmyMack 2010-02-19 19:18
Eddie, I only mentioned your ginger buddy in my comment to show that like this year, people wanted the manager moved on, and a.n. other brought in. I didn't intend there to be any other comparison.

That said, I re-read some articles from this time last year, and find it hard to swallow, that all of the points raised, which were wholly valid, are now left unmentioned.

For a taste of what I'm getting at, see Michael Dolan's Spending millions more than other SPL clubs.

Sadly, I have no faith in TM, none whatsoever.

BTW, just noticed I have 472 symbols left, which I'm guessing is the max. Think this is what hotlicks meant re the symbols? 1000 letter limit?
 
 
-1 #23 JimmyMack 2010-02-19 19:21
I was told that I need to register to post a comment, yet I'm already logged in, and had just sent my first reply to you?

Has anyone else encountered this problem, at all?
 
 
0 #24 hotlicks 2010-02-19 22:41
Yeah it was only allowing me 1000 symbols eddies, seems fixed now, cheers.



I backed TM much as you did Eddie and I still do.

Am I right in saying that generally the support applauded his ethos and bought into it? Surely we have enough faith to at least give the guy a fair crack at fixing the problems. Don't get me wrong, I am gutted at the way things have panned out this season and 'MUST DO BETTER' is in green highlighter pen all over his report card, but for me his job is not finished and I would regret the decision to sack him before the season has finished at least.

Its pretty clear that times have changed since Martin O'Neill's wonderful era. One of the reasons his reign got so much support was because we hadnt dominated scottish football in so long that many were willing to forgive his deficiencies. Thing is, I think people still use his standard as the least we should expect as Celtic fans. Im sorry to bring MON into it but, I'm damn sure Man Utd fans might be inclined to compare their future managers alongside Sir Alex. Poor guys onto a hiding. MON introduced us to success again. Not just Hay or McNeill success but serious 'nobody messes with us' success. He put Celtic at the top of the game and in the main, we haven't looked back.

There's a seriously deluded hun in my work who harks back to the glory days of their nine in a row and is always comparing players, ie Weir/Gough Boyd/Sally etc. Nutjob. But still, he's obviously struggling to come to terms with the fact that they used to totally dominated the game up here and can't understand why we laugh at him!!

So, are our expectations higher now? Yes.

Is it harder to accept a longer period of transition to hopefully another successful era?...that's where we are now I would say.

Looking at the affordable candidates, does anyone seriously think there is not one manager out there that will NOT come in for flack as Celtic manager.

All it would take is a poor run or bad luck and the Internet frenzy will kick in, and once it does it's hard to stop it....

Lambert 'inexperienced - twist'
Lennon 'too soon - twist'
Collins 'too smug - GTF'
Coyle 'bitten off too much - twist'
Bilic 'not British - twist'
Mark Hughes 'Won nothing - GTF'

....and so on and so forth.

By the way, whoever started this "stick or twist" pish on KDS is partly to blame. Splits the support for starters. And is a bullshit way to get opinion.

So anyway, for what it's worth, I think the board will take the long term view and will see him to the next January transfer window before seriously considering his position.

Quick fixes fail more often than succeed, and yes it is FAR more exciting watching Celtic these days.

What was it they used to say?

KEEP THE FAITH!!!
 
 
-1 #25 eddiepearson 2010-02-19 22:42
Had a look at the restrictions and increased the amount of characters each comment is allowed.

As for wanting the last manager to move on around this time of year - I keep coming back to the feeling that we were going nowhere under Strachan and I feel we are moving in the right direction under Mowbray. There is an argument that we aren't moving forward fast enough or consistently. Which points from last year were unmentioned?

And I have no idea what's going on whit the registering to post. If you're logged in it should be sorted. Anyone else struggling with that?
 
 
+1 #26 hotlicks 2010-02-19 22:45
Quoting eddiepearson:
Had a look at the restrictions and increased the amount of characters each comment is allowed.

As for wanting the last manager to move on around this time of year - I keep coming back to the feeling that we were going nowhere under Strachan and I feel we are moving in the right direction under Mowbray. There is an argument that we aren't moving forward fast enough or consistently. Which points from last year were unmentioned?

And I have no idea what's going on whit the registering to post. If you're logged in it should be sorted. Anyone else struggling with that?



Aye Eddie, i had to re-register.
 
 
-2 #27 eddiepearson 2010-02-19 22:52
I'm really impressed with what Lambert is achieving down there but it's two leagues below the top level and we have to wait and see what happens when he starts to get a real challenge.

I'd be delighted for him if he managed to be a success in the championship and would expect him to be considered then but at the moment he's doing it at a level below which we should be looking surely?

Collins is definitely too smug and am I the only one who still holds it against him for the way he left the club?

Coyle is starting to feel the heat and it will be interesting to see how he deals with it. It should be noted that Derek McInnes managed what he couldn't with St Johnstone. Although he did look the part with Burley.

Bilic I just don't get. An earring and a guitar doesn't make a decent manager for me.

And as I have said, Hughes' Blackburn didn't play the way I'd like to see Celtic play.

Which leaves me with Lennon. And I'm starting to think that Lennon might be someone to keep an eye on.
 
 
-1 #28 eddiepearson 2010-02-19 22:53
Quoting hotlicks:
Aye Eddie, i had to re-register.


I couldn't get the old user database to copy over to the new site so everyone that was registered on the old site had to re register I'm afraid. However, once you register on here that should be you sorted.
 
 
+1 #29 hotlicks 2010-02-19 23:20
Quoting eddiepearson:
I'm really impressed with what Lambert is achieving down there but it's two leagues below the top level and we have to wait and see what happens when he starts to get a real challenge.

I'd be delighted for him if he managed to be a success in the championship and would expect him to be considered then but at the moment he's doing it at a level below which we should be looking surely?

Collins is definitely too smug and am I the only one who still holds it against him for the way he left the club?

Coyle is starting to feel the heat and it will be interesting to see how he deals with it. It should be noted that Derek McInnes managed what he couldn't with St Johnstone. Although he did look the part with Burley.

Bilic I just don't get. An earring and a guitar doesn't make a decent manager for me.

And as I have said, Hughes' Blackburn didn't play the way I'd like to see Celtic play.

Which leaves me with Lennon. And I'm starting to think that Lennon might be someone to keep an eye on.


Whoever comes in will face the same "frenzy" as TM has Eddie. Every single candidate will have flaws and people seem hell bent on highlighting them.

Wish i could make the meeting tomorrow but probably working.
 
 
0 #30 the daddy 2010-02-19 23:47
Cheers PAC, thanks for your comment. With regards to your comment to quote your good self "the ignorance of that comment is astounding"

Having followed Celtic far longer than you, I have known many leaner times than you have.

I am simply advocating patience, asking that maybe the manager might be given just a little time to overhaul the squad and, that a season without a title may be the price we have to pay. For those who can’t wait that long, then fine, away you go and come flocking back next season. when times are better, as you’ve done before.

And before you question how I can know that I have followed Celtic longer than you. Believe me Paul I know, I know.
 
 
+1 #31 danny bhoy 2010-02-20 01:11
Daddy maybe the following should apply "The Greatest Power is Often Simple Patience"
 
 
0 #32 PragmaticCelt 2010-03-02 00:00
Wow PAC is called paul? For once a sane celtic fan called paul with no idealistic notions. On the net I have met about 10 deluded pauls so its nice to have a good one. PAC'S piece was not a ramble, it was the truth. I would love to see Mark Hughes as Blackburn are exactly the style we need to win games.

Strachan was a celtic great he won 3 trophies and got us into the last 16. Mowbray is worse than Barnes he has us out of europe, out of the league and whats more with far superior players to our opponents. He may be a very good scout but he is not a manager. Why should celtic put up with failure and what makes any sane person think that time will make Mowbray a winner? IF he shows no evidence of winning consistantly so far what makes you think he will start to do it now? The Daddys attack on a far wiser poster in PAC is quite a shame but is much better than the fair that CQN or tictalk offer. Now thats mudslinging sites for you.

We are also boring to watch under Mowbray half the time we score no goals the other time we score and lose them in similar quantity.
 

You need to register to post comments.

RocketTheme Joomla Templates